Shakespear & # 8217 ; s Taming Of The Shrew Essay, Research Paper
In Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s Taming of the Shrew, one subject that has been debated, interpreted, discussed, reinterpreted and adapted has been the character of Katharine, the termagant, and whether she was tamed, liberated, or merely a good plenty actress to do everyone believe she was in fact, tamed. There are many statements for and against each of these points, every bit good as an statement that discusses one telecasting version of Taming of the Shrew that presents Katherine non as the expected termagant, but as Petruccio & # 8217 ; s tamer. In add-on to the telecasting show, two different films besides discuss the present different versions of Katherine. The first film is the Franco Zaffirelli version gazing Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor. This film presents an version in which Petruccio tames Katherine, but leaves it unfastened for the viewing audiences to construe whether or non Katherine is merely moving. The other illustration I am utilizing is a film called 10 Thingss I Hate About You. This film is a 1999 version of the Taming of the Shrew. Although the managers have changed about every portion of the Shakespearean drama, the implicit in narrative is largely the same. Kat and Patrick are thrown together, and it becomes Patrick & # 8217 ; s occupation to chasten Kat. In this version, both Kat and Patrick learn and alteration from each other. Though there are many versions and readings of Katherine and the manner she turns out, she is non tamed, and she does non chasten, alternatively she is liberated, and learns to populate and love.
There is much grounds, which supports the statement that Petruccio tamed Katherine. For case, in the gap of the drama, Katherine is really vocal and aggressive. Men, adult females and kids trembled whenever she came about, including her male parent and sister. An illustration of this is when Katherine is speaking with her male parent about his love for her sister. & # 8220 ; What, will you non endure me? Nay, now I see/ She is your hoarded wealth, she must hold a hubby. / I must dance barefoot on her nuptials twenty-four hours, / and for your love to her lead apes in snake pit. / Talk non to me. I will travel sit and weep/ Till I can happen an juncture of retaliation & # 8221 ; ( Act 2 Scene 1, Lines 31-36 ) . From the minute that Katherine and Petruccio meet, Petruccio vows to chasten the termagant. He begins the chastening procedure instantly.
After Kate and Petruccio are married, Kate attempts to asseverate control in her life. & # 8220 ; Nay, than, make what thou canst, I will non travel today, / No, Nor tomorrow- non till I delight myself & # 8221 ; ( 3.3 lines 79-80 ) . Kate is fighting to stay in control of the state of affairss in her life. Unfortunately for her, Petruccio will non let it.
& # 8221 ; But for my bonnie Kate, she must with me.
I will be maestro of what is mine ain.
She is my goods, my movables. She is my house,
My household-stuff, my field, my barn,
My Equus caballus, my ox, my buttocks my anything,
And here she stands, touch her whoever daring & # 8221 ; ( 4.1 Lines 98-104 ) .
Petruccio issues a challenge to anyone who assists Kate in her rebelliousness. He makes it cognize ; excessively non merely Kate instead to all that will listen ; that she is his belongings and will make what he says. By the terminal of the drama, nevertheless, she is presented as being mild and submissive to Petruccio, taking up to her greatest address in the duologue of the drama.
Thy hubby is thy Godhead, thy life, thy keeper,
Thy caput, thy crowned head ; one that cares for thee,
And for thy care commits his organic structure
To painful labour both by sea and land,
To watch the dark in storms, the twenty-four hours in cold,
Whilst 1000 liest warm at place, secure and safe ;
And craves no other testimonial at thy custodies
But love, just expressions and true obeisance ;
Excessively small payment for so great a debt. ( 5.2. 150-58 )
In looking at this outtake of Katherine & # 8217 ; s address, it can be seen that she has been tamed by Petruccio & # 8217 ; s actions throughout the first four Acts of the Apostless. It is hard to take Katherine & # 8217 ; s message here and state, & # 8220 ; She is still the same person. & # 8221 ; Her soliloquy reveals that she now sees it is her responsibility to esteem her hubby and to be submissive to him. Her address leads the audience to see that this responsibility of the married woman is one that is a refund to the hubby for all the difficult work he does to back up her, a debt that the married woman could ne’er perchance refund. Reasons why Katherine might non hold been tamed can be found in the fact that the drama takes topographic point in what seems to be merely a few yearss. Is it possible for such a individual & # 8217 ; s behaviour to alter so drastically in such a short sum of clip? It is really improbable that it is possible, since Katherine, by the gap of the drama, is at least 20 old ages of age and is really much set into her ways. It would take much longer to bring around Katherine of this attitude job she possesses. With this in head, it is really likely that Petruccio either liberated Katharine in how to command her pique, or she acted as if she had been tamed to acquire everyone off of her dorsum.
Since it does non look possible for Katherine to be tamed by Petruccio in the short clip period of the drama, it is possible that she was liberated by Petruccio & # 8217 ; s actions. In the film version of Taming of the Shrew, starring Elizabeth Taylor as Katherine and Richard Burton as Petruccio, the stoping sequence is presented with the widow and Bianca declining to come out at their suer & # 8217 ; s petition. Petruccio so sends for Katherine, and with the looks on everyone & # 8217 ; s face, it can be assumed they were non anticipating her to come out either. Alternatively, Katherine does come out, with Bianca under one arm and the widow under the other. It was at this point that she delivered her address quoted above. Now, if she was tamed, it is dubious she would hold come out with the other adult females in her clasps. It is more likely she would hold come out entirely, stating something along the lines of & # 8220 ; Yes, my darling Petruccio, what can I make for thee? & # 8221 ; Alternatively, she forces the other adult females to be obedient to their partners, still demoing some of the fearful aggressiveness at the beginning of the drama. I see this as grounds that Petruccio has liberated Katherine in a sense that she no longer needs to be cheeky and aggressive at all times, but alternatively she can utilize her assertiveness for her hubby & # 8217 ; s advantage, and for her ain advantage. In other words, together, the
Y made a great squad with Petruccio’s great humor and ability to play word games at the bead of a chapeau and Katherine’s strong will and stubbornness. I find that they no longer utilize these on each other, except for amusement, but to act upon and derive stature and control to those around them.
In the 1999 move 10 Things I Hate About You, there is much grounds which suggests that Patrick does non chasten Kat as he is supposed to, but alternatively they learn and change from each other. Patrick is a unsmooth and dogged delinquent who is paid to take out and tame Kat. As Patrick is working to finish the occupation, he begins to larn and understand why Kat is the manner she is, a bitch. He realizes that she is non rather every bit atrocious as others make her out to be, and alternatively is merely looking for person who would understand what her. Katherine besides learns from Patrick. She learns that though it is easy to be disappointed and hurt in life, she is non able to populate life without experiencing. Katherine had, refused to allow anyone acquire close plenty that he or she would be able to ache her. When she let Patrick in, she realized that although person has the ability to ache her, it is non a ground to travel through life without feeling. She does, in some ways, become tamed as consequence of her relationship with Patrick, but non tamed in the sense that she looses her individuality. She is still her ain individual, and can still populate her life they manner she wants to, but is now able to allow love and other people into her life.
So far, all the illustrations I have given have presented Katherine as the tamed, liberated or moving termagant. I would wish to show a different position of Katherine as something other than the one being tamed, and expression at a modern reading that displays her as the tamer. I late had an chance to see a recording of the 80 & # 8217 ; s telecasting comedy Moonlighting, starring Bruce Willis and Cybill Shepherd. In this show, a particular was done on a alteration of Taming of the Shrew with Willis & # 8217 ; character as Petruccio and Shepherd & # 8217 ; s as Katherine. For the first portion of the show, the version follows the original Shakespeare text. There are some autonomies taken by the authors of the show, demoing some bantering wit. Some of that wit includes Petruccio siting in on a Equus caballus with both of them have oning Ray-Ban dark glassess, the saddle has the logo for BMW on the side, and Katherine has a cupboard full of & # 8220 ; inexpensive & # 8221 ; vases to throw at her suers.
However, as the comedy progresses, an interesting turn is given & # 8211 ; get downing when Petruccio and Katherine return to Padua for the nuptials of Bianca and Lucentio. It specifically occurs as Petruccio is facing Baptista about having the promised dowery for marrying Katherine. During this scene Baptista demands cogent evidence that Katherine has been tamed, a portion of the deal for having the dowery, because he had heard rumours that Katharine was non tamed or liberated, but alternatively that Petruccio was the 1 that had given in to Katherine & # 8217 ; s aggressive nature. To turn out he had tamed Katherine, Petruccio states to her that the Earth in the sky is the Moon at noontime. Katherine turns to the blaze Sun, and after a few minutes of silence from the whole town waiting for her response, says & # 8220 ; My hubby, you are mistaken. For it is the Sun. I beg you, look again. & # 8221 ; The aghast crowd turns to Petruccio. Who, alternatively of acquiring huffy and endangering that they return to his place, stares back at the Sun, and says, & # 8220 ; Why, you are right, how foolish of me. & # 8221 ; The remainder of the narrative ends with a fluctuation of Katherine & # 8217 ; s address in an 1980 & # 8217 ; s manner & # 8211 ; that adult male and adult female are to be peers and should non seek to be dominant over the other, and that it was Petruccio & # 8217 ; s kindness towards her that won her bosom, for she was still the same opinionative adult female. She states that what adult females genuinely want is for work forces to handle them with regard and they will have the same regard in return. In other words, Katherine was non the one needing to be tamed, but the cheeky attitude of Petruccio.
Throughout this essay, I have presented four different statements about the topic of Katherine & # 8217 ; s chastening. In analysing the text of the drama and seeing how different readings have presented the taming, that Katherine was non needfully tamed, but alternatively realized that Petruccio was non traveling to accept her nagging behaviour. She realized that in order to do an atrocious state of affairs work, she had to accept what Petruccio was offering, but on his footings. Katherine realized that by being obedient to Petruccio he treated her as an equal, she besides realized she needed to compromise her nature to maintain this adult male she was falling in love with, which leads to her being liberated. I say Katherine is liberated because she still displays some of her nagging attitudes, during the banquet for Lucentio and Bianca & # 8217 ; s nuptials and dragging the two ladies to their hubbies. If Katherine had been tamed at this point, she would non hold been aggressive towards the two ladies.
In the drama it would besides be hard for Katherine to feign she was moving, she would hold risked being discovered if she showed herself being aggressive with the ladies. If she was liberated and able to be as an equal with Petruccio, she would hold acted the manner she did & # 8211 ; aggressive towards those who were being stubborn about their hubby & # 8217 ; s authorization. I see it as Katherine was seeking to demo them that if they were obedient to their hubby, the hubby would handle them as an equal. I besides find I have to hold with the Moonlighting version of the drama, in a sense. It has to be seen that if Katherine gave in some of her attitude towards Petruccio, Petruccio besides had to give in some of his ain attitude. The attitude of demoing regard and obeisance and receive regard and equality, although carried to an extreme in the Moonlighting episode, can be seen in all the versions of the drama discussed. She realizes that she does non hold to compromise what she believes in, merely how she goes about making and stating something & # 8217 ; s. In decision, I believe that Katherine is non the lone 1 who became liberated through the class of the drama, but Petruccio every bit good. Both Katherine and Petruccio alteration throughout the drama. Their characters turn and spread out throughout the drama and in the terminal, they both become better people, Katherine released from her nagging ways, and Petruccio released from his overbearing, ruling masculine personality.