Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

Hypothesis and Prediction:

This lab was done to analyze and grok how diffusion and osmosis plants in diverse molar concentration of saccharose. Besides how the solutions permeates through different mediums.

Methods:

Part A: Diffusion and Osmosis:

A 30 cm piece of 2.5 cm dialysis that has been soaked in H2O was obtained. The beginning of tubing was tied off, organizing a bag with an unfastened terminal that was rubbed between the fingers till separated. 15mL of the 15 % glucose and 1 % starch solution was placed into the bag and the stoping of the dialysis bag was tied off, go forthing some infinite for the development of the content within the dialysis bag. The colour of the solution was recorded and was tested for the presence of glucose. Distilled H2O was poured into a 250 milliliter beaker ( two-thirds of a cup ) with about 4mL of Lugol ‘s solution ( IKI ) . The colour of the saccharose in the beaker was recorded and was tested for glucose. The dialysis bag was so submerged into the beaker of solution and left to stand for approximately 30 proceedingss ( or until there was a colour alteration in the dialysis bag or beaker ) .Once the bag was done soakage in the beaker, the concluding colour of the solution in the bag and the beaker was recorded. The liquid in the bag and the beaker was so tested for the being of glucose.

Part B: Osmosis

Six strips of 30 centimeter presoaked dialysis tube were obtained. For each strip, an terminal was tied and approximately 25 milliliter of different solutions ( distilled H2O, 0.2 M saccharose, 0.4 M saccharose, 0.6 M saccharose, 0.8 M saccharose and 1.0 M saccharose ) was poured into their single bags. Most of the staying air was so removed from each bag by conveying the bag between two fingers and tied off at the opened terminal. The exterior of each bag was so bathed to rinse away any sucrose that spilled when make fulling the bag. The outside of each bag was so blotted and the initial mass of each bag was weighed and recorded. Distilled H2O was so filled into six 250 milliliter beakers. Each bag was so emerged into one of the six filled beaker and the beakers were labeled by which bag of solution was emerged in it. The bags stood in the beaker for half an hr. When the clip was up, each bag was removed, blotted and the mass of each bag was recorded. The mass difference was calculated and so utilizing the equation:

Percentage alteration in mass = Final Mass – Initial Mass/Initial Mass x 100.

The person and the category norm of the per centum alteration in mass were so graphed.

Part C: Water Potential

100 milliliter of the given solution was poured into six different labeled 250 milliliter beaker. The murphy was so sliced into phonograph record that were merely approximately 3 centimeters thick. A cork bore bit ( about 5 millimeters in diameter ) was so used to cut four murphy cylinders for each beaker, a sum of 24 murphy nucleuss. Until the mass of nucleuss were weighed by 4s and recorded, the murphy nucleuss were kept in a covered beaker. Four nucleuss were so put into each beaker of sucrose solution. Plastic wrap was so given to cover the beakers, forestalling vaporization when left to stand overnight. The following twenty-four hours, the nucleuss were so removed from the beakers and were blotted gently on a paper towel. Their entire mass was so determined and recorded. The mass difference was calculated and so utilizing the equation:

Percentage alteration in mass = Final Mass – Initial Mass/Initial Mass x 100.

The person and the category norm of the per centum alteration in mass were so graphed.

Part D: Calculation of Water Potential from Experimental Data

Determine the solute, force per unit area and H2O potency of the sucrose solution given and reply the inquiries about the possibility if zucchini nucleuss were used with the sucrose solutions.

Consequences:

Part A: Diffusion and Osmosis

Table 1.1-Presence of Glucose in Water through a Dialysis Bag

Initial Contentss

Solution Color

Presence of Glucose

Initial

Concluding

Initial

Concluding

Bag

15 % GLUCOSE and 1 % STARCH

Clear

Clear

Yes

Yes

Beaker

H20 + IKI

Yellow

( an olive oil colour )

Clear

No

Yes

Part B: Osmosis

Table 1.2: Individual Data of Change in Mass of Six Different Dialysis Bags

Contentss in Dialysis Bag

Initial Mass

Concluding Mass

Mass Difference

Percentage Change in Mass

a ) distilled H2O

18.15 g

14.76 g

3.39 g

-18.68 %

B ) 0.2 M

19.40 g

17.33 g

2.07 g

-10.67 %

degree Celsius ) 0.4 M

18.87 g

19.37 g

-0.5 g

2.65 %

vitamin D ) 0.6 M

19.83 g

19.68 g

-0.15 g

-0.5 %

vitamin E ) 0.8 M

21.91 g

20.05 g

-0.869 g

-8.2 %

degree Fahrenheit ) 1.0 M

18.78 g

18.07 g

-0.71 g

-3.7 %

Table 1.3: Class Data of Percent Change in Mass of Dialysis Bags

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Group 5

Group 6

Group 7

Group 8

Entire

Class Average

Distilled Water

-18.68 %

-2.2 %

-7.0 %

-7.2 %

-35.1

-8.8 %

0.2 M

-10.67 %

-22.3 %

-5.2 %

1.8 %

-36.4 %

-9.1 %

0.4 M

2.65 %

6.2 %

2.5 %

3.9 %

15.3 %

3.8 %

0.6 M

-0.76 %

-3.8 %

-4.0 %

-6.55 %

-15.2 %

-3.8 %

0.8 M

-4.1 %

-26.3 %

-1.6 %

-3.78 %

-35.95 %

-8.95 %

1.0 M

-3.78 %

-3.27 %

-8.7 %

-29.4 %

-45.2 %

-11.3 %

Group 2, 4, 6 and 8 do non hold any informations for distilled H2O, 0.2M Sucrose, and 0.4M Sucrose and group 1, 3, 4 and 7 do non hold any informations for 0.6M Sucrose, 0.8M Sucrose and 1.0M Sucrose because of the deficiency of clip. So, group 1 and 2 were paired up, 3 and 4, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8 to interchange informations.

Part C: Water Potential

Table 1.4: Individual Data of Change in Mass of Potato Cores in Six Different Sucrose Solution

Contentss in Beaker

Initial Mass

Concluding Mass

Mass Difference

Percentage Change in Mass

Class Average % Change in Mass

a ) Distilled Water

2.39g

2.95g

0.56g

23.4 %

23.3 %

B ) 0.2M Sucrose

2.41g

2.69g

0.28g

11.6 %

8.4 %

degree Celsius ) 0.4M Sucrose

2.47g

2.38g

-0.09g

-3.6 %

-3.7 %

vitamin D ) 0.6M Sucrose

2.33g

1.98g

-0.35g

-15.0 %

-13.5 %

vitamin E ) 0.8M Sucrose

2.46g

2.05g

-0.41g

-16.7 %

-19.9 %

degree Fahrenheit ) 1.0M Sucrose

2.49g

1.95g

-0.54g

-21.7 %

-20.8 %

Table 1.5: Class Data of Percent Change in Mass of Potato Cores in Six Different Sucrose Solution

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Group 5

Group 6

Group 7

Group 8

Entire

Class

Average

Distilled

Water

23.4 %

18.9 %

23.2 %

27.5 %

93 %

23.3 %

0.2M

11.6 %

6.8 %

5.0 %

10.1 %

33.5 %

8.4 %

0.4M

-3.6 %

-3.7 %

-7.0 %

-0.4 %

-14.7 %

-3.7 %

0.6M

-15.02 %

-13.5 %

-11.16 %

-14.3 %

-54 %

-13.5 %

0.8M

-16.67 %

-22.5 %

-20.33 %

-20.2 %

-79.7 %

-19.9 %

1.0M

-21.69 %

-24.3 %

-24.39 %

-12.9 %

-83.3 %

-20.8 %

Group 2, 4, 6 and 8 do non hold any informations for distilled H2O, 0.2M Sucrose, and 0.4M Sucrose and group 1, 3, 4 and 7 do non hold any informations for 0.6M Sucrose, 0.8M Sucrose and 1.0M Sucrose because of the deficiency of clip. So, group 1 and 2 were paired up, 3 and 4, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8 to interchange informations.

Part D: Calculation of Water Potential from Experimental Data

Analysis:

Part A: Diffusion and Osmosis

From table 1.1 in this portion of the lab, it is seen that IKI is fluxing into the bag and glucose is fluxing out of the bag. That is because of diffusion and osmosis. Knowing of this procedure is due to the colour transmutation of the bag, hence demoing that IKI has penetrated the bag. By proving the beaker for the being of glucose, it was found that the glucose permeated through the dialysis bag, blending with the IKI and H2O in the beaker. This is possible because as declared osmosis is a branched off signifier of diffusion, in which it is the diffusion of H2O through a selectively permeable membrane and glucose is one of the substance that is able to travel through. IKI along with glucose is bantam plenty to come in and go out the dialysis bag.

Part B: Osmosis

Both the person and category informations of per centum alteration in mass is shown in graph 1.1. To have the per centum alteration in mass, the initial mass was subtracted from the concluding mass. The difference is so divided by the initial mass and 100 is so multiplied to the quotient. The merchandise is so the per centum alteration in mass. Osmosis is present due to the alteration in mass of the dialysis bag. The mass is different for each bag because of the saccharose in the bags different molar concentration. That establishes the sum of H2O that progresses in and out of the bag, which so changes the mass.

Part C: Water Potential

From proving the murphy cores in different sucrose solution, graph 1.2 illustrates that on the best fit line, the molar concentration of saccharose, the sucrose molar concentration that shows the mass of the murphy cores does non alter, is 0.4M. So the lower the concentration of the molar concentration of saccharose, the per centum of the murphy nucleuss ‘ mass additions and anything with a higher concentration of the molar concentration of sucrose the per centum in the murphy nucleuss ‘ mass lessenings. This is all because molecules of any sucrose with a higher concentration of 0.4M are excessively great to come in or go out into the murphy nucleuss.

Part D: Calculation of Water Potential from Experimental Data

It is given that the solute potency of the sucrose solution is calculated by utilizing ?s= iCRT. ?s is the solute potency, the variable “i” represents the ionisation invariable, variable “C” signifies the molar concentration, variable “R” standing for the force per unit area invariable ( R= 0.0831 litre bars/mole Oklahoma ) , T is the temperature Oklahoma ( 273+ oC of solution ) . Since it is the solute potency of saccharose that must be found, “i” is 1.0, due to the fact that saccharose does non ionise in H2O. From the information of “i” , “C” is determined to be 1.0 mole/liter. So the job that has 1.0M sugar solution at 22 oC under atmospheric conditions would be answered like this:

Since the expression is ?s= iCRT, so when make fulling in for the variables the equation is now:

?s= – ( 1 ) ( 1.0mole/liter ) ( 0.0831 litre bar/ mole Oklahoma ) ( 273+22 ) a ?s =-24.51 bars

The H2O potency can so be figured out by the expression: ? = ?p + ?s. By being able to work out for the solute potency, the merchandise would so be used to work out for the H2O potency. And from the cognition of cognizing that the H2O force per unit area, ?p, is equal to zero the expression filled out would turn out as:

?=0 + ( -24.51 bars ) a ? = -24.51 bars

From the graph of the per centum alteration in mass of courgette nucleuss in different sucrose solution at 27 oC after 24 hours it can be concluded that the molar concentration of solute within the courgette cell is 0.35 moles. From cognizing the molar concentration of solute within the courgette cell, the solute and H2O potency can be answered.

Solute Potential= -1 ( 0.35moles/liter ) ( 0.0831 litre bar/mole Oklahoma ) ( 273 +27 ) a = -8.73 bars

Water Potential= 0 + ( -8.73 ) a = -8.73 bars

This is an of import piece of information because by cognizing the H2O potency, it is possible to foretell the way of the flow of H2O. Water flows from an country of a higher H2O potency to and country of lower H2O potency ; so if the information of the H2O potency of the solution in the beaker which the courgette ‘s were soaked was given, the information of where the H2O flows would be known.

Decision:

This lab was to understand how diffusion and osmosis worked. The information that was received was consistent at some times. For portion A and D of the lab, the consequences and computations were consistent, but portion B and C showed small consistence. That is because portion B and C when comparing the per centum alteration in mass with others, the Numberss varied. The difference of the mass was changed, for it possibly misdirecting, into per centum, there extinguishing any size factor and to compare the consequences. Though when comparing the per centums with one another, some of the difference was excessively great to have any accurate informations. Some possibilities that may hold altered the result of the consequences include the terminals of the dialysis bags non being tied right, the inaccuracy of pouring the solutions, non a thorough cleansing of the exterior of the dialysis bag and wrong computation and measurings. This lab can be modified to acquire a more consistent information by have oning baseball mitts when working with the solutions, so when 1 is done pouring and binding the dialysis bag, baseball mitts can be removed to cut down any opportunity of the solution being on the exterior of the bag. A more accurate and precise measuring of the solution and the stringency and method of binding the terminals of the bags can be arranged to be the same. With those changes to the lab, the opportunity of a more consistent information is higher.

Post Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *