Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

Andrea Dworkin Essay, Research Paper

Andrea Dworkin

Andrea Dworkin has been an influential write, talker, and militant for

over two decennaries. She claims to be a women’s rightist, and that her thoughts are

good to adult females. This paper will demo that many of her most popular beliefs

are non merely damaging to society, but besides non in the best involvements of adult females.

In letters from a war zone, Andrea Dworkin presents a aggregation of

addresss and short articles she has composed during her calling as a author and

militant. Many of her articles trade with censoring and erotica. One claim

is cardinal to all of these, erotica is an act and non an thought, therefore

censoring is non relevant to it.

In response to a New York Time Review of her 1981 book, Pornography: Work force

Possessing Women, Dworkin writes, ? Pornography says the adult females want to be hurt,

forced, and abused ; erotica says adult females want to be raped, battered, kidnapped,

maimed ; erotica says adult females want to be humiliated, shamed, defamed,

erotica says that adult females say no but intend yes & # 8211 ; Yes to violence, yes to trouble. ?

( Dworkin p 203 )

In response to Dworkin & # 8217 ; s ardent rhetoric, Wendy Mcelroy writes that

Dworkin has scientific backup and even cites grounds to the reverse. ? In

Japan, where erotica picturing force is widely available, colza is much

lower per capita than in the United States, where force in erotica is

restricted. ? Mcelroy attacks the belief that erotica cause force,

saying that even if a correlativity is present, is does non needfully intend

there is a causal relationship. ( McElroy 102 )

Lynne Segal sees in built-in injury in seeking to associate the two together.

She believes that women’s rightists who try to make so are blowing valuable clip that

could be spent on other of import issues. ? In the terminal, anti-pornography

runs, women’s rightist or non, can merely enlist today, as they have invariously

enlisted before, guilt and anxiousness around sex, every bit good as life-times of confusion

in our personal experiences of sexual rousing and activity. ? ? In contrast,

runs which get to the bosom of work forces & # 8217 ; s force and sadism towards adult females must

enlist the widest possible resources to authorise socially. ? ( Gibson 19 )

Another statement of Dworkin & # 8217 ; s is that erotica should non be

protected as free address under the first amendment. It is her contention that

protecting what porn merchants say, is protecting what erotica does.

Pornography is more than words. They are Acts of the Apostless against adult females. ? Pornography

happens to women. ? As a consequence, prohibitions on such stuff are warranted, non merely

because it is detrimentally and prejudiced to adult females, but besides because there are

no civil autonomies that are violated in forestalling an act. ( Dworkin 185 )

Since it is unsure whether there is even a correlativity between

force against adult females and erotica, any effort to censor it must be viewed as

censoring. What of all time it is referred to, it still has the same consequence.

In many of Dworkin & # 8217 ; s Hagiographas, she laments the silencing of adult females. She

is partly responsible for this silencing. In 1992, The Canadian Supreme

Court ruled in favour of a legal limitation on erotica based on the

psychological harm it does adult females. ? Ironically, this lewdness jurisprudence has been

used about entirely against homosexual, sapphic, and feminist material. ? ( McElroy

87 )

The consequence of censoring is perfectly damaging the weaker voice, as

is the instance with the Butler determination. Dworkin herself fell victim, when her

book, Pornography, was seized by Canadian imposts functionaries. Censoring in

contradictory to feminist ends, because freedom of address is the most powerful

arm in the feminist armory. Medical diaries used by medical pupils, and

the testimony of adult females victimized by sexual maltreatment are premier marks of

censoring. ( Strossen 77 )

An episode affecting Dworkin and her cohort in censoring, Catherine

MacKinnon, demonstrates the dangers of censoring. At a symposium at A Michigan

jurisprudence school, at which Dworkin and MacKinnon were talking, a group of women’s rightists

had prepared a series of docudramas of the subject of the conference,

harlotry. Dworkin refused to talk at the symposium if adversarial talkers

were at that place, so the docudramas were the lone voice of resistance to them.

When work got out that the docudramas could perchance pornographic, Dworkin

and MacKinnon insisted on their remotion. When the presenter refused, they

coerced the pupils with menaces of go forthing, to coerce the removed of the

documental exhibit. What had started out as an academi

degree Celsiuss symposium rapidly

turned into a forum for the sole protagonism of Dworkin ideals. Her action

epitomized the danger of censoring to society and other women’s rightists, she silenced

the weaker voice. ( Strossen 211-214 )

Dworkin & # 8217 ; s sentiments on erotica are summed up nicely by Wendy McElroy ;

Pornography is morally incorrect ; Pornography leads straight to force against

adult females ; Pornography, in and of itself, is force against adult females. Five

single allegation are made based of the 3rd point ; Women are physically

coerced into erotica ; Women in erotica who have non been coerced have been so

traumatized by patriarchate that the can non give existent consent ; Capitalism is a

system of? economic coercion & # 8217 ; that forces adult females into erotica in order to

do a life ; Pornography is force against adult females who consume it, and

thereby re-enforcing their ain subjugation ; Pornography is force against

adult females, as a category, who must populate in fright because of the ambiance of panic it

creates. ( Mcelroy 91 )

The first three allegations deal with coercion. The first claim is

based on a few stray instances and should non be used to qualify the full

industry. The 2nd allegation is non merely chesty, but degrades adult females

because it undermines a adult female & # 8217 ; s ability to take. ? If adult females & # 8217 ; s picks are

being trashed, why should extremist women’s rightists ( i.e. Dworkin ) menu better than

other adult females? ? This sends a unsafe message that adult female lack full capacity to

brand picks. The 3rd allegation fails in a similar manor as the 2nd.

Dworkin draws no line between consent and coercion, and therefore she rejects a

adult female & # 8217 ; s right to contract. ( McElroy 92-95 )

The 4th and 5th claim of Dworkin & # 8217 ; s are besides in contradiction with

adult females & # 8217 ; s best involvements. The 4th claim wholly ignores the possibility

that adult females might really bask erotica without falling victim to it.

Leting adult females entree to a agency of sexual look with existent sex grants

them increased sexual freedom. The concluding allegation is based on the impression that,

? Womans are non persons, but members of a category with corporate involvements. ?

In doing this claim, Dworkin must destruct the impression of individualism, and

status unsuitable for non merely adult females, but all humanity. ( McElroy 96 )

Another unfavorable judgment of Dworkin, is that many of her statements contain

logical incompatibilities or straight-out contradictions. For one thing, Dworkin

wants to formalize the experience of adult females who have be silenced by patriarchate yet

garbages to accept the voices of adult females who participate in erotica. Dworkin

besides believes that erotica is the bastion of patriarchate, yet conservativists,

tradition title-holder of patriarchate, besides campaign against erotica. ( McElroy

98 )

In one of Hagiographas of cesarian subdivisions, Dworkin make staunch, in writing,

comments about the subject. It is laced with information about confederacies and

loaded with coarseness. Such utmost linguistic communication may work against the involvements of

adult females, because even though a job might be, it might be written of by

readers due to Dworkin & # 8217 ; s? inflated harangue. & # 8217 ; ( Strossen 196 )

In general, Dworkin & # 8217 ; s Hagiographas while claiming to be feminist, are frequently

in direct struggle with mainstream women’s rightist docket. Many of her positions portray

adult females as incapacitated victim incapable of rational thought. In her support of

censoring, she is besides met be rough opposition from outstanding adult females & # 8217 ; s groups

such as N.O.W.. Many of her position are seen as harmful to the cause of adult females & # 8217 ; s

equality, and in this respect are more unsafe so anti-women & # 8217 ; s cabals,

because it is written under the streamer of feminism. ( Gibson 118 )

Andrea Dworkin & # 8217 ; s influence has created an environment where free address

and equality are compromised. Though she claims it to be in the best involvement

of society, this merely is non true. Most women’s rightists reject her thoughts as

counterproductive to their ends. Her authorship are non merely damaging to adult females,

nevertheless, everyone is affected. By recommending censoring, she undermines every

rule that this state was founded on and every ideal that keeps it unified

and free from subjugation. Ironically, Dworkin seeks freedom from subjugation for

adult females, but in making so advocates cosmopolitan subjugation for all people, adult females and

work forces.

Plants Cited

1. Dworkin, Andrea Letters from a War Zone. Lawrence Hill 1993.

2. McElroy, Wendy A Woman & # 8217 ; s Right To Pornography St. Martin Press 1995

3. Gibson, Pamela Church and Gibson, Roma Dirty Looks British Film Institute 1993

4. Strossen, Nadine Defending Pornography Doubleday 1995

Post Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *