& # 8217 ; s Payment Essay, Research Paper
A Fool & # 8217 ; s Payment
In the short narrative, & # 8220 ; The Necklace, & # 8221 ; a greedy and selfish adult female brings fiscal ruin upon herself and her hubby. They go from a comfy life style in a somewhat moth-eaten flat to an destitute being in an Attic flat. Mathilde Loisel was born to a lower in-between category French household, but she wished that she could hold of baronial birth. Her yearning for a better life caused her great heartache. When she could hold been happy with her state of affairs in life, alternatively she would woolgather of a expansive place and affluent, dignified friends. When she borrowed a diamond necklace from a friend and lost it at an elegant party, she brought ruin to her hubby and herself. Not merely does Guy de Maupassant use the necklace as a vehicle for the difficult times that the Loisels had to digest, but he besides uses it as a symbol to learn a lesson about the reverberations of greed, ruin, and sorrow.
To get down with, Maupassant displayed the necklace as everything that Mathilde had of all time desired. The necklace was & # 8220 ; & # 8230 ; superb & # 8230 ; and [ Mathilde & # 8217 ; s ] bosom throbbed with desire for it & # 8221 ; ( Maupassant 6 ) . Mathilde had her pick of & # 8220 ; & # 8230 ; watchbands, & # 8230 ; a pearl necklace, & # 8230 ; a Venetian cross of finely worked gold and gems & # 8221 ; ( Maupassant 6 ) , but alternatively she chose to take the most expensive and finest looking bauble in her friend & # 8217 ; s gem box. The diamond necklace revealed to the reader that Mathilde no merely wanted
the finest things, but she besides wanted the most epicurean and expensive 1s to be found. While she could hold had the most beautiful gems, her hungriness for glamor and her desire to look affluent caused her to take a simple diamond necklace. After she lost it at the party, she could non travel to her friend and explicate the loss. Alternatively, she and her hubby conspired to buy a new one to replace it. If Mathilde had been happy with her new and beautiful frock alternatively of wanting for the finer things in life, so she would non hold brought ruination upon herself and her hubby.
Maupassant besides showed how the necklace symbolized the ruin of the Loisels when he wrote how they purchased a replacing necklace:
[ They paid with the ] & # 8230 ; 18 thousand francs that his male parent had left him & # 8230 ; borrowed, inquiring a thousand francs from one, five hundred from another, five Louiss here, three Louis at that place. He wrote promissory notes, undertook catastrophic duties, did concern with finance companies and the whole folk of loan sharks. He compromised himself for the balance of his yearss, risked his signature without cognizing whether he would be able to honour it, & # 8230 ; [ Then ] he went to acquire the new necklace, and put down 36 thousand francs on the jewelry maker & # 8217 ; s counter. ( 8-9 )
Mr. Loisel risked ruination to pay for his married woman & # 8217 ; s stupidity and greed. Not merely did he take on awful debts, but he wo
rked on many side occupations merely to assist acquire the measures paid. Therefore, he was put on the lining his wellness every bit good as his name’s value. The debt had to be paid, the little household moved into an Attic flat and released the amah. Very rapidly, Mathilde realized how comfy her old life style had been in contrast to her new agonies. Since Mathilde lost her friend’s necklace, she had to pay for her misbehaviors. “She learned to make the heavy housekeeping, soiled kitchen occupations. …she took the refuse down to the street, …dressed in inexpensive frocks, … [ and ] went to the fruit trader, the grocer, the butchers… [ and kept ] supporting her measly hard currency penny by penny” ( Maupassant 9 ) . The poorness that was brought on by the disappearing of the necklace altered the Loisel’s old life style to where they were fighting to remain afloat.
Finally, the necklace is used to demo Mathilde & # 8217 ; s repent. After 10 old ages, & # 8220 ; they had paid back everything & # 8221 ; ( Maupassant 9 ) , and the destitute life had hardened Mathilde. She no longer looked immature and fresh and she had grown old before her clip, all because of the necklace and that one dark of revelry. Even though she had become a common adult female, & # 8220 ; sometimes, & # 8230 ; she sat down near the window, and dreamed of that flushing so long ago, of that party, where she had been so beautiful and admired & # 8221 ; ( Maupassant 10 ) . She besides felt much compunction and frequently wondered & # 8220 ; what life would hold been like if she had non lost that necklace & # 8221 ; ( Maupassant 10 ) . Possibly though, the most regret was felt after she talked to her rich friend who revealed that the necklace had non been a diamond one, but a inexpensive bauble. All of the debt and jobs that she and her hubby had faced because of the necklace were evitable if she had merely told her friend of its disappearing earlier.
Maupassant showed that the necklace was decidedly non worth the ruination that it caused the Loisels. The poorness and want that was brought approximately by the necessity to refund the loans taken out to pay for the replacing could hold been avoided. If Mathilde had non been so foolish as to try to be what she was non, rich, or had told her friend the truth, so she would hold saved herself and her hubby from the heartache and destroy it caused. Guy de Maupassant showed that the necklace non merely represented the greed, ruin, and sorrow of a adult female, but it besides symbolized the crushed hopes of a adult female who wanted excessively much from life. Hopefully, most people are happy with what life has bestowed upon the. If non, they should non try to derive material ownerships that will merely convey ruin and enduring alternatively of love and felicity.
Maupassant, Guy de. & # 8220 ; The Necklace. & # 8221 ;
Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing
Ed. Edgar V. Roberts and Henry E. Jacobs. 5th erectile dysfunction.
Upper Saddle Rive, NJ: Prentice, 1998. 3-10.